Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

An integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials evaluating nasogastric against postpyloris (nasoduodenal and nasojejunal) feeding in critically ill patients admitted in intensive care unit

Abstract

This article presents the systematic review of the randomized, controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of nasogastric (NG) versus postpyloris (PP) feeding in critically ill surgical patients and other patients in intensive therapy unit (ITU). Twenty randomized trials recruiting 1496 patients were retrieved from the standard electronic databases. There were 760 patients in the NG feeding group and 736 patients in the PP feeding group. There was significant heterogeneity among trials. PP feeding in ITU patients was associated with lower gastric residual volume (odds ratio (OR), 3.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19, 13.14; z=2.24; P<0.03; I2=73%) and a reduced risk of developing aspiration pneumonia (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.98; z=2.03; P<0.04; I2=10%) compared with NG feeding. In addition, higher proportion of caloric requirements (standardized mean difference, −1.02; 95% CI, −1.73, −0.31; z=2.82; P<0.005; I2=95%) could be delivered with PP feeding. Risk of gastrointestinal complications, overall mortality and length of ITU stay were similar between the two techniques of enteral feeding. In summary, PP feeding in ITU patients reduces the gastric residual volume and risk of aspiration pneumonia. PP feeding is also superior to NG feeding in terms of delivering higher proportion of daily caloric requirements. PP feeding with the help of nasoduodenal or nasojejunal tube may be used routinely in ITU patients for nutritional support.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schroeder D, Gillanders L, Mahr K, Hill GL . Effects of immediate postoperative enteral nutrition on body composition, muscle function, and wound healing. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1991; 15: 376–383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, Minard G, Tolley EA, Poret HA et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann Surg 1992; 215: 503–511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Doig GS, Heighes PT, Simpson F, Sweetman EA, Davies AR . Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 2018–2027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P, Canadian Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. Canadian Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2003; 27: 355–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NE, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P, Kazandjiev G et alDGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine); ESPEN (European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition). ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Intensive care. Clin Nutr 2006; 25: 210–223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cahill NE, Dhaliwal R, Day AG, Jiang X, Heyland DK . Nutrition therapy in the critical care setting: what is ‘best achievable’ practice? An international multicenter observational study. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 395–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heyland DK, Tougas G, King D, Cook DJ . Impaired gastric emptying in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 1339–1344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heyland DK, Tougas G, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH . Cisapride improves gastric emptying in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. A randomized, double-blind trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154 (6 Pt 1), 1678–1683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Artinian V, Krayem H, DiGiovine B . Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients. Chest 2006; 129: 960–967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cook DJ, Meade MO, Hand LE, McMullin JP . Toward understanding evidence uptake: semirecumbency for pneumonia prevention. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1472–1477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kollef MH . Prevention of hospital-associated pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 1396–1405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH, DiSario JA, Heyland DK, Maloney JP et al. North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill Patient: consensus statement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002; 26: S80–S85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehta NM, McAleer D, Hamilton S, Naples E, Leavitt K, Mitchell P et al. Challenges to optimal enteral nutrition in a multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2010; 34: 38–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta NM, Bechard LJ, Cahill N, Wang M, Day A, Duggan CP et al. Nutritional practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes in critically ill children—an international multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 2204–2211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Berger MM, Berger-Gryllaki M, Wiesel PH, Revelly JP, Hurni M, Cayeux C et al. Intestinal absorption in patients after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 2217–2223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore FA, Cocanour CS, McKinley BA, Kozar RA, DeSoignie RC, Von-Maszewski ME et al. Migrating motility complexes persist after severe traumatic shock in patients who tolerate enteral nutrition. J Trauma 2001; 51: 1075–1082.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heyland DK, Drover JW, MacDonald S, Novak F, Lam M . Effect of postpyloric feeding on gastroesophageal regurgitation and pulmonary microaspiration: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1495–1501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McElroy LM, Codner PA, Brasel KJ . A pilot study to explore the safety of perioperative postpyloric enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract 2012; 27: 777–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holmes S . Enteral nutrition: an overview. Nurs Stand 2012; 26: 41–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dive A, Michel I, Galanti L, Jamart J, Vander Borght T, Installé E . Gastric acidity and duodenogastric reflux during nasojejunal tube feeding in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 574–580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sefton EJ, Boulton-Jones JR, Anderton D, Teahon K, Knights DT . Enteral feeding in patients with major burn injury: the use of nasojejunal feeding after the failure of nasogastric feeding. Burns 2002; 28: 386–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5·0·0 (updated February 2008). http://www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed 20 August 2011).

  23. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.0. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration: Copenhagen 2008.

  24. DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177–188.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DeMets DL . Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Stat Med 1987; 6: 341–350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Higgins JP, Thompson SG . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539–1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG . Systematic reviews in healthcare. BMJ Publishing: London, 2006.

  28. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ . Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. Systemic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context 2nd edn 2001 Egger Matthias, Smith George Davey, Altman Douglas G, (eds), BMJ Publication group: London. pp 285–312.

  29. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ . Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chalmers TC, Smith Jr H, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D . A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials 1981; 2: 31–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cochrane IMS http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/otherresources/gradepro/download (accessed on 21st of December 2012).

  32. Acosta-Escribano J, Fernández-Vivas M, Grau Carmona T, Caturla-Such J, Garcia-Martinez M, Menendez-Mainer A et al. Gastric versus transpyloric feeding in severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective, randomized trial. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1532–1539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Boivin MA, Levy H . Gastric feeding with erythromycin is equivalent to transpyloric feeding in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1916–1919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Davies AR, Morrison SS, Bailey MJ, Bellomo R, Cooper DJ, Doig GS et al. ENTERIC Study Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing early nasojejunal with nasogastric nutrition in critical illness. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 2342–2348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Davies AR, Froomes PR, French CJ, Bellomo R, Gutteridge GA, Nyulasi I et al. Randomized comparison of nasojejunal and nasogastric feeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 586–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Day L, Stotts NA, Frankfurt A, Stralovich-Romani A, Volz M, Muwaswes M et al. Gastric versus duodenal feeding in patients with neurological disease: a pilot study. J Neurosci Nurs 2001; 33 (148-149), 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Eatock FC, Chong P, Menezes N, Murray L, McKay CJ, Carter CR et al. A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 432–439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Heyland DK, Drover JW, MacDonald S, Novak F, Lam M . Effect of postpyloric feeding on gastroesophageal regurgitation and pulmonary microaspiration: results of a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1495–1501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hsu CW, Sun SF, Lin SL, Kang SP, Chu KA, Lin CH et al. Duodenal versus gastric feeding in medical intensive care unit patients: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 1866–1872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hsu TC, Su CF, Huang PC, Lu SC, Tsai SL . Comparison of tolerance and change of intragastric pH between early nasogastric and nasojejunal feeding following resection of colorectal cancer. Clin Nutr 2006; 25: 681–686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kearns PJ, Chin D, Mueller L, Wallace K, Jensen WA, Kirsch CM . The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and success in nutrient delivery with gastric versus small intestinal feeding: a randomized clinical trial. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1742–1746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kortbeek JB, Haigh PI, Doig C . Duodenal versus gastric feeding in ventilated blunt trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma 1999; 46: 992–996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kumar A, Singh N, Prakash S, Saraya A, Joshi YK . Early enteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nasojejunal and nasogastric routes. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 431–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Meert KL, Daphtary KM, Metheny NA . Gastric vs small-bowel feeding in critically ill children receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. Chest 2004; 126: 872–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Montecalvo MA, Steger KA, Farber HW, Smith BF, Dennis RC, Fitzpatrick GF et al. Nutritional outcome and pneumonia in critical care patients randomized to gastric versus jejunal tube feedings. The Critical Care Research Team. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 1377–1387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Montejo JC, Grau T, Acosta J, Ruiz-Santana S, Planas M, García-De-Lorenzo A et alNutritional and Metabolic Working Group of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units. Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing the efficacy and gastrointestinal complications of early jejunal feeding with early gastric feeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 796–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Neumann DA, DeLegge MH . Gastric versus small-bowel tube feeding in the intensive care unit: a prospective comparison of efficacy. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1436–1438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Singh N, Sharma B, Sharma M, Sachdev V, Bhardwaj P, Mani K et al. Evaluation of early enteral feeding through nasogastric and nasojejunal tube in severe acute pancreatitis: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Pancreas 2012; 41: 153–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Strong RM, Condon SC, Solinger MR, Namihas BN, Ito-Wong LA, Leuty JE . Equal aspiration rates from postpylorus and intragastric-placed small-bore nasoenteric feeding tubes: a randomized, prospective study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992; 16: 59–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Taylor SJ, Fettes SB, Jewkes C, Nelson RJ . Prospective, randomized, controlled trial to determine the effect of early enhanced enteral nutrition on clinical outcome in mechanically ventilated patients suffering head injury. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2525–2531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. White H, Sosnowski K, Tran K, Reeves A, Jones M . A randomised controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients. Crit Care 2009; 13: R187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Marik PE, Zaloga GP . Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: a systematic review. Crit Care 2003; 7: R46–R51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Petrov MS, Correia MI, Windsor JA . Nasogastric tube feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis. A systematic review of the literature to determine safety and tolerance. JOP 2008; 9: 440–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M S Sajid.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The abstract of this article has been presented at the 100th Annual General Meeting of Association of Surgeons of Great Britain & Ireland in Glasgow on 1–3 May 2013. The abstract has been published in the Supplement Issue of the British Journal of Surgery (Br J Surg 2013; 100(S7): 41).

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sajid, M., Harper, A., Hussain, Q. et al. An integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials evaluating nasogastric against postpyloris (nasoduodenal and nasojejunal) feeding in critically ill patients admitted in intensive care unit. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 424–432 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.6

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links