Original articleWilliam T. Thorwarth award paperThe Role of Negative CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis in the Decision to Admit Adults From the Emergency Department After Blunt Trauma
Introduction
The technology available to clinicians today is increasingly more sensitive than the tools available to prior generations. These sensitive tools allow physicians to provide better care to patients. Improvements in quality almost always are accompanied by increased cost, which must be weighed against the benefit provided by a test [1]. In the case of blunt trauma, the established benefits of positive computed tomography (CT) have resulted in the widespread use of CT as a screening tool of trauma patients in emergency departments (EDs) [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].
However, the value of a negative examination is not as defined. In 1998, Livingston et al [8] published a multi-institutional prospective trial in the Journal of Trauma demonstrating that admission for observation after negative abdominal CT in blunt abdominal trauma patients was not necessary. They postulated that the adoption of this policy into clinical practice would result in a substantial benefit to the medical system in terms of cost and resource utilization, without resulting in harm to individual patients.
Our study used a retrospectively created cohort of trauma patients in a single busy level 1 trauma center to determine if these benefits of negative imaging have translated into clinical practice. We hypothesized that negative CT of the abdomen and pelvis (CT AP), in the setting of blunt trauma, would be associated with a significantly lower admission rate.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Our medical center is an 821-bed, level 1 trauma center, as designated by the state of North Carolina. Over the past 5 years, the number of trauma evaluations has been steadily increasing. In 2002, 2,169 adult trauma patients were evaluated, and in 2003, 2,410 adult trauma patients were evaluated. Using the picture archiving and communication system at our institution, a retrospective data set of patients who received CT AP in the ED was created.
The data set consists of all patients scanned by
Results
A search of the picture archiving and communication system database for patients who received CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis from August 1, 2003 to November 30, 2004, for trauma-related indications yielded 527 patients. The final group of 469 patients was created after excluding 8 patients for evaluation more than 24 hours after the traumatic event, 2 patients for penetrating trauma, 1 for an incomplete medical record, and 47 for age less than 18 years. Our medical center has a separate
Discussion
In the era before the common availability of body CT and ultrasound in the emergency room, the principal diagnostic tools used to evaluate for blunt trauma injuries were limited. These included the physical examination; laboratory and radiographic examinations, including excretory urography and angiography; exploratory laparotomy; and clinical observation. Computed tomography was initially used in blunt trauma patients in whom physical examinations were unreliable or difficult to obtain.
Conclusion
At our institution, negative CT AP in the ED evaluation of adult blunt trauma patients did result in a significantly lower admission rate, an important benefit of the test. Our evaluation of the current trauma literature suggests that the considerable information provided by rapid and thorough CT scanning of adult blunt trauma patients, whether the results are positive or negative, outweighs the costs and risks associated with the increase in technology utilization.
References (23)
Multi-detector row CT imaging of blunt abdominal trauma
Semin Ultrasound CT MR
(2004)- et al.
The role of computed tomography in diagnosis of blunt intestinal and mesenteric trauma (BIMT)
J Emerg Med
(2004) - et al.
CT diagnosis of splenic infarction in blunt traumaimaging features, clinical significance and complications
Clin Radiol
(2004) - et al.
Should helical CT scanning of the thoracic cavity replace the conventional chest x-ray as a primary assessment tool in pediatric trauma?An efficacy and cost analysis
J Pediatr Surg
(2003) - et al.
Computed tomography for blunt abdominal trauma in the EDa prospective study
Am J Emerg Med
(1998) - et al.
Abdominal CT scanning for traumahow low can we go?
Injury
(2000) - et al.
Clarification of the role of CT scan in the acute evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma
Conn Med
(1991) - et al.
Multidetector computed tomography and blunt thoracoabdominal trauma
J Comput Assist Tomogr
(2004) - et al.
Admission or observation is not necessary after a negative abdominal computed tomographic scan in patients with suspected blunt abdominal traumaresults of a prospective, multi-institutional trial
J Trauma
(1998)
Evaluation of abdominal trauma by computed tomography
Radiology
Cited by (12)
How useful are clinical findings in patients with blunt abdominal trauma?
2014, Annals of Emergency MedicineElevated levels of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein breakdown products in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury are associated with intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention
2012, Annals of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :According to recent estimates, 62 million CT scans are performed annually in the United States.11 Although increasing CT use has improved diagnostic capabilities and reduced hospital admissions,12 it has also raised concern over unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation.13-17 Some studies suggest that CT scans of the head may be among the largest contributors to radiation exposure because of the frequency with which they are performed.18,19
Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute blunt abdominal trauma
2011, Annals of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guidelines do not specifically mention those patients with isolated blunt abdominal trauma, but recommend that patients with multiple injuries in the setting of a negative abdominal CT result warrant further observation.20 Multiple studies have been conducted that report the sensitivity and specificity for the CT in detecting abdominal injuries in patients with blunt abdominal trauma21-24; however, this question will focus on a subgroup of patients with isolated trauma who are hemodynamically stable. Few studies have directly evaluated hemodynamically stable patients.3,25,26
Clinical Prediction Rules for Identifying Adults at Very Low Risk for Intra-abdominal Injuries After Blunt Trauma
2009, Annals of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Identifying patients with intra-abdominal injuries can be difficult because the abdominal examination does not reliably identify all patients with intra-abdominal injuries.2-6 With improvement in computed tomography (CT) technology, abdominal CT scanning has become the primary method of evaluating hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients believed to be at risk for intra-abdominal injury at both trauma and nontrauma centers.6-13 Despite the increase in use of abdominal CT scanning in blunt trauma, the indications for abdominal CT in this setting are not well defined.14
Use of CT scans for abdominal pain in the ED: Factors in choice
2020, American Surgeon
Editor’s Note: The Thorwarth Award is presented by the ACR at the AUR Annual Meeting for the best paper submitted on health economics.