Trauma/conceptTrauma Surgery: Discipline in Crisis
Introduction
As articulated by a recent president of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma: “The specialty of trauma surgery is in trouble!”1 Potent economic, logistic, political, and workforce challenges increasingly confront this discipline. Trauma surgeons have characterized their field as “in the throes of an identity crisis that threatens its future”2, 3 and that the status quo is “untenable.”4 They have stated that “the discipline must change to remain viable and attractive to future candidates.”5 Trauma surgeons are “clearly an endangered species,”6 “gasping for air,”7 and “in danger of becoming extinct.”3, 7, 8 One contends that “the contemporary model of trauma care where dedicated trauma/critical care surgeons exclusively manage trauma patients has become progressively unsustainable.”9
These adverse conditions in the field of trauma surgery have developed and progressively worsened during the past quarter century; however, the rate of change has been slow enough that few emergency physicians have taken notice or considered the potential ultimate effect. Patients and emergency physicians have much to lose by this budding crisis in our partner discipline. In this article, I review the challenges facing the field of trauma surgery, their historical context, current workforce issues, and the potential directions available to this discipline. I discuss the implications of these issues for emergency physicians and for trauma care overall.
Section snippets
The “Golden Age” of Trauma Surgery
One quarter century ago was the “golden age of trauma surgery.”3, 6, 10 General surgery was a hotly competitive and prestigious specialty choice, and many of the best and brightest surgeons gravitated to careers in trauma care. The practice of trauma surgery was founded on aggressive, lifesaving operations. “The trauma surgeon was regarded as the ‘master surgeon'3, 6 who operated effectively on the neck, chest, abdomen, and any injured blood vessel.”6
The life of a trauma surgeon was regarded as
The Surgical Paradigm of Trauma
Surgeons were justifiably alarmed at the uneven trauma expertise of physicians staffing emergency departments (EDs) in the late 1970s—primarily internists, family physicians, and residency dropouts—and understandably acted to fill this void. The founding tenets of their trauma care philosophy were the concept of golden hour11, 12 and the possessive declaration that “trauma is a surgical disease.”11
Accordingly, the American College of Surgeons–developed paradigm for trauma care was wholly
The Shift to Nonoperative Management
A quarter century of progress has fundamentally altered the premises underlying the surgical paradigm of trauma. Dramatic advances in the speed and resolution of computed tomography have largely replaced “exploratory” surgery; indeed, even in the setting of radiographically documented intra-abdominal injury, most patients can now be safely treated nonoperatively.4, 9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The practice of trauma surgery has transitioned from the invigoration of frequent “emergency” laparotomies to
Threats to the Field of Trauma Surgery
Potent economic, logistic, political, and workforce challenges increasingly confront trauma surgery and are summarized as follows.
The Shortage of Trauma Surgeons and Its Implications
For reasons already discussed, fewer medical students are becoming surgeons, and fewer surgeons are becoming trauma surgeons. Many existing trauma surgeons are scaling back or abandoning their trauma practice in favor of traditional general surgery.1, 2, 3, 5, 79 As stated by the American College of Surgeons, “surgeons who remain in the emergency care system are experiencing professional and personal burdens that are simply unsustainable.”50
Despite this shortage of trauma surgeons, to maintain
How Are Trauma Surgeons Responding to These Threats?
Some trauma surgeons propose to reinvigorate their field by redefining it as “Acute Care Surgery.”10 Specifically, this makeover would expand their operative scope to include selected neurosurgical and orthopedic trauma procedures and would expand their nontrauma scope to include critical care and emergency surgeries. The premise is that adding more actual surgery will make the practice more interesting and attractive and that a switch to shift work will permit a more controllable lifestyle.
The
What Else Can be Done?
Patients and emergency physicians have much to lose by this crisis in our partner discipline. The shortage of career trauma surgeons is serious and a grave threat to the quality of trauma care. Substituting moonlighting struggling surgeons in their place can only diminish the overall quality of trauma care. It is conceivable that inaction will lead to a true crisis in the loss of trauma surgeon coverage for those uncommon patients who truly require emergency operations.
Conclusion
The discipline of trauma surgery is in crisis, partly from external economic and political forces and partly from their own dated paradigm of trauma care. Emergency physicians must understand these threats and do what they can to help preserve the career trauma surgeon for the benefit of our patients.
References (92)
- et al.
Making the case for a paradigm shift in trauma surgery
J Am Coll Surg
(2006) - et al.
Acute care surgery: Eraritjaritjaka
J Am Coll Surg
(2006) Trauma in transition: a fantastic voyage
J Am Coll Surg
(2006)- et al.
Operative management of abdominal injuries in children
Semin Pediatr Surg
(2001) - et al.
Has the trauma surgeon become house staff for the surgical subspecialist?
Am J Surg
(2006) - et al.
Trauma team activation: simplified criteria safely reduces overtriage
Am J Surg
(2007) Is there evidence to support the need for routine surgeon presence on trauma patient arrival?
Ann Emerg Med
(2006)- et al.
Development of trauma systems and effect on outcomes after injury
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
ATLS versus ETC: time for a decision
Ann Emerg Med
(2006) - et al.
Where are our future surgeons?characteristics of medical student graduates planning surgical careers
J Am Coll Surg
(2006)
Do the best students go into general surgery?
J Surg Res
Is there declining interest in general surgery training?
Curr Surg
The surgical personality: fact or fiction
Am J Surg
A preliminary measurement of the surgical personality
Am J Surg
Whole-body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients who were never examined
Ann Emerg Med
The European trauma course—from concept to course
Resuscitation
Emergency physicians' voice in the ACLS protocol: guideline's eclectic committee should serve as model
Ann Emerg Med
Delivery of emergency neurosurgical care
J Am Coll Surg
Do the American College of Surgeons' “major resuscitation” trauma triage criteria predict emergency operative management?
Ann Emerg Med
Role of the acute care surgeon in the emergency department management of trauma
Ann Emerg Med
The future of trauma care: At the crossroads
J Trauma
Trauma surgery: is it time for a facelift?
Ann Surg
The shape of things to come: results from a national survey of trauma surgeons on issues concerning their future
J Trauma
The academic trauma center is a model for the future trauma and acute care surgeon
J Trauma
Trauma/critical care surgeon: a specialist gasping for air
J Trauma
Intubation alone does not mandate trauma surgeon presence on patient arrival to the emergency department
J Trauma
The general surgery model: a more appealing and sustainable alternative for the care of trauma patients
Am Surg
Acute care surgery: trauma, critical care, and emergency surgery
J Trauma
Advanced Trauma Life Support Manual
The golden hour: scientific fact or medical “urban legend”?
Acad Emerg Med
Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient
Trauma: the paradigm for medical care in the 21st century
J Trauma
Will future surgeons be interested in trauma care?results of a resident survey
J Trauma
The 15-year evolution of an urban trauma center: what does the future hold for the trauma surgeon?
J Trauma
The resident experience on trauma: declining surgical opportunities and career incentives?analysis of data from a large multi-institutional study
J Trauma
Discussion regarding “Pediatric trauma is very much a surgical disease.”
Ann Surg
Trauma centers and trauma surgeons: have we become too specialized?
J Trauma
Is there an ideal model for training the trauma surgeons of the future?
J Trauma
Clinical decision rules for secondary trauma triage: predictors of emergent operative management
Ann Emerg Med
Discussion regarding “The resident experience on trauma.”
J Trauma
Accreditation guidelines
Is a full team required for emergency management of pediatric trauma?
J Trauma
Trauma management outcomes associated with nonsurgeon versus surgeon trauma team leaders
Ann Emerg Med
A comparative study of designated trauma team leaders on trauma patient survival and emergency department length-of-stay
Can J Emerg Med
Guidelines for essential trauma careWorld Health Organization
Cited by (0)
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The author has stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.
Supervising editors: Judd E. Hollander, MD; Michael L. Callaham, MD
Drs. Hollander and Callaham were the supervising editors on this article. Dr. Green did not participate in the editorial review or decision to publish this article.
Reprints not available from the author.
Publication dates: Available online September 11, 2008.