Paper from the Hospital Infection Society Meeting ‘Bridging the Gap’ held on 6 November 1992
Closing the loop: audit in infection control

https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(93)90062-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The audit cycle has four parts: setting standards, testing practice and outcome against these standards, correcting practice where it falls short, and re-auditing to confirm that standards are now met. The last two steps complete the audit cycle or ‘close the loop’. Infection control can be audited for whether written guidelines exist for each procedure, whether these guidelines are acceptable and whether they are followed in practice. This form of audit is relatively simple provided there are authoritative model guidelines available, produced by organizations such as the Hospital Infection Society. The best outcome measure of infection control is the nosocomial infection rate, but this is the most difficult to audit in practice. If audit results are to be compared between hospitals or between different time periods in the same hospital, infection rates should be adjusted for the underlying risks of infection in the patient population. This type of audit can be done by repeated prevalence surveys.

References (6)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Repeat Auditing of Primary Health-care Facilities Against Standards for Occupational Health and Infection Control: A Study of Compliance and Reliability

    2020, Safety and Health at Work
    Citation Excerpt :

    Audit has been defined as “a quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic review of care against explicit criteria and the implementation of change” [1]. The audit cycle involves five stages: choosing a topic, specifying practice standards, testing actual practice against these standards, corrective action, and finally demonstrating improvement in practice through subsequent data collection and closing the loop [2]. Given the significant financial and personnel investment required to conduct accreditation programmes, research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness and reliability of health-care facility accreditation and/or certification in improving patient safety and quality outcomes [3].

  • The infection control audit: The standardized audit as a tool for change

    2007, American Journal of Infection Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    Unfortunately, most audits involving infection control focus on environmental cleanliness rather than encompassing unit procedures as they apply to the practice of infection prevention.2 To be truly effective, an audit must consist of a topic, appropriate practice standards, observation and testing against the selected standards, identification of areas for improvement, and subsequent interventions and demonstration of improvement in practice.3-5 Following completion of the first 3 infection control audits in the early 1990s, it was apparent that there was a need for a more consistent and organized review process.

  • Audit in infection control

    2006, Journal of Hospital Infection
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text