Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

The psychomotor challenges inherent in laparoscopic surgery are evident by the steep procedural “learning curves” documented throughout the literature. Few methods have been described to evaluate learning curves. The cumulative summation (CUSUM) method is a criterion-based evaluation of the learning process. The purpose of this study is to describe the CUSUM learning curves for a simple task for individuals and for a group of novice laparoscopists.

Methods:

Sixteen medical students undertook four weekly sessions of 10 laparoscopic pegboard transfers in the MISTELS system. Their performance was scored and recorded for each trial. CUSUM learning curves were constructed based on the goal of achieving mean scores for senior, intermediate, or junior laparoscopists ≥95% of the time.

Results:

Based on senior criteria, one student achieved the goal by the 40th peg transfer trial. Based on intermediate criteria, three students achieved the goal by their 40th trial (trials 21 and 36), and for junior criteria, 10 students achieved the acceptable success rate by their 40th trial (range, 26–40).

Conclusion:

CUSUM analysis suggests criterion-based practice is useful for novice laparoscopists. It allows educators to track the progress of an individual toward target criteria for each MISTELS task, to more logically allocate time for training and set attainable goals, to objectively evaluate trainee acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills, and to identify trainees who need remediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Oliveira Filho GR (2002) The construction of learning curves for basic skills in the anesthetic procedures: an application for the cumulative sum method. Anesth Analg 95: 411–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH, Fried GM (1998) The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 12: 1117–1120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation for laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175: 482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy RS, Dunlap WP, Wilkes RL, Lane NE (1985) Factor analysis of a fifteen-minute microcomputer-based performance test battery. EOTR, Essex Corporation, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  5. Konrad C, Schupfer G, Wietlisbach M, Gerber H (1998) Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg 86: 635–639

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lane NE (1987) Skill acquisition rates and patterns: issues and training implications. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawler PG, Patla VR, Garcia E, Puttick N (1991) Assessment of training in anaesthesia and related skills. Anaesthesia 46: 597

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCarter FD, Luchette FA, Malloy M, Hurst JM, Davis K, Johannigman JA, Frame SB, Fischer JE (2000) Institutional and individual learning curves for focused abdominal ultrasound for trauma. Ann Surg 231: 689–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Melvin WS, Johnson JA, Ellison EC (1996) Laparoscopic skills enhancement. Am J Surg 172: 377–379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Molloy M, Bower RH, Hasselgren P-O, Dalton BJ (1999) Cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy—cumulative sum analysis of an institutional learning curve. J Gastrointest Surg 3: 185–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G (2001) Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg 233: 159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 200–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (1999) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 3rd ed. Human Kinetics, Windsor, ON, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, Frawley WH, Rege RV, Jones DB (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182: 137–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shapiro SJ, Paz-Partlow M, Daykhovsky L, Gordon LA (1996) The use of a modular skills center for the maintenance of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 10: 816–819

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith CD, Farrell TM, McNatt SS, Metreveli RE (2001) Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg 181: 547–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Rij AM, McDonald JR, Pettigrew RA, Putterill MJ, Reddy CK, Wright JJ (1995) CUSUM as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee. Br J Surg 82: 1500–1503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams SM, Parry BR, Schlup MMT (1992) Quality control: an application of the CUSUM. Br Med J 304: 1359–1361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Tyco-Healthcare Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. M. Fried.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fraser, S.A., Feldman, L.S., Stanbridge, D. et al. Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill. Surg Endosc 19, 1572–1578 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0150-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0150-5

Keywords

Navigation