Table 3

Patient characteristics of TA vs. TR vs. non-TR consults after pit stop implementation

Trauma activationsTrauma resourcesNon-TR ED consultsP value
n994474217
Mean age47.2±22.659.9±2664.8±21.6<0.001*
Males (%)685 (69)259 (55)121 (56)<0.001†
Mechanism—fall (%)265 (27)283 (60)134 (62)<0.001†
Mechanism—MVC (%)349 (35)103 (22)21 (10)<0.001*
Mean door to physician evaluation (min)0.5±3.08.7±16.79.9±17.9<0.001*
Mean door to CT scan (min)25.4±11.250.0±59.995.4±71.00.0495
Mortality (%)40 (4)7 (2)7 (3)0.0348‡
Admitted to trauma service (%)591 (60)76 (16)213 (98)<0.001†
Mean LOS¶ (days)7.6±9.94.7±2.94.8±5.8<0.001†
Median LOS¶ (IQR)5 (3, 8)4 (3, 5.25)3 (2, 5)<0.001§
  • Χ2 and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey tests used for comparison.

  • *Difference between all three groups (Tukey test).

  • †Difference between TA and TR and TA and non-TR consult (Tukey test).

  • ‡Difference between TA and TR (Tukey test).

  • §Difference between TA and non-TR consult and TR and non-TR consult (Tukey test).

  • ¶Calculation applies only to admitted patients.

  • ED, emergency department; LOS, length of stay; MVC, motor vehicle crash; TA, trauma activation; TR, trauma resource.