Methods
A retrospective review of a single institution’s trauma registry (maintained on Trauma One, V.4.1, Lancet Technologies, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) was performed. All patients 18 years of age and older discharged from the hospital between January 2011 and August 2019 after sustaining blunt trauma and transported by EMS from the field to the regional/level 1 trauma center for a suburban county of approximately 1.5 million in New York State were included. Exclusion criteria included burns, drowning/diving injuries, hangings, penetrating trauma, death in the emergency department (ED), interfacility transfers, and non-EMS mode of arrival. Interfacility transfers were excluded as they may or may not reflect EMS decision making, for example, if the cervical collar was applied by the referring facility, then it is improbable that EMS would remove it for transfer. Of note, as this query is based on discharge criteria, three patients who were admitted with cervical spine injury in 2010 but discharged in 2011 were included.
In concordance with national trends, selective prehospital cervical SMR by EMS providers in New York State was mandated by the Department of Health in 2008 and guidelines were further updated in 2015.22 23 Briefly, the protocol indicated that for patients who do not meet major blunt trauma criteria, criteria for spinal motion restriction include altered mental status for any reason; complaint of neck and/or spine pain or tenderness; weakness, tingling, or numbness of the trunk or extremities at any time since the injury; deformity of the spine not present prior to this incident; distracting injury or circumstance; or high-risk mechanism of injury (MOI) such as axial load, high-speed motorized vehicle crashes or rollover, or falls greater than standing height. It further indicated that if any doubt, suspect spine injury. In 2015, the protocol updated high-risk mechanisms to include falls >3 feet/5 steps or greater than patient’s height and also included pedestrian or bicyclist collisions.23 Additional high-energy MOI include high-speed motor vehicle collision (MVC)/motorcycle collision, a height >3 times the patient’s body height, and axial loading forces. In contrast, low-energy MOI include falls from standing height or low surface and low speed MVC. The protocol indicated that a ‘positive MOI is not considered means to necessitate full motion restriction but should be used as a guide to heighten a provider’s suspicion for an SCI’.23 24 The corresponding presentation indicated that older age is a high risk factor for spinal injury.24
Patients with C-spine injuries meeting study criteria were identified from the state-mandated trauma registry. Demographics, injury characteristics, National Trauma Data Standard defined comorbidities and complications, as well as outcomes were extracted from the trauma registry.25 The determination of prehospital SMR was initially captured by a data field in the trauma registry indicating prehospital spinal immobilization, which refers to prehospital C-SMR. The registrars concurrently examine the prehospital patient care record (PCR) for documentation indicating the utilization of prehospital spinal motion restriction in the narrative and/or in a PCR field indicating ‘spine immobilization neck and back’. Additional sources for these data are ED records, including trauma team activation flowsheets, if any. Secondary chart review was conducted in those without prehospital spinal motion restriction but with C-spine injury. For patients to have been classified as having prehospital C-SMR, they could have had a rigid collar, straps/head blocks, etc. In cases of inconsistency in the medical record on secondary review, patients were classified as having prehospital C-SMR. In one patient with radiographic cervical spine injury, the presence/absence of prehospital C-SMR could not be confirmed and in another the C-spine injury was thought to have likely occurred at a prior event. Hence, these two patients were excluded from all analyses.
The medical records of all patients with cervical spine injury (bone, ligament, and/or SCI) in the trauma registry were examined to characterize imaging findings (CT scan and/or MRI) and management. Patients with C-spine injuries noted only on autopsy were not included, nor were the few patients with spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality, for example, those with ‘stingers’ or clinical sprains. Patients with isolated disk herniation were also excluded, unless it was clear that this was an acute injury that resulted in neurological deficit from cord involvement. Bone injury (fracture or subluxation) was characterized based on CT reports. Of note, lateral mass and pars interarticularis fractures were coded as one. Body, endplate, and tubercle fractures were coded as vertebral body fractures. The term posterior elements fractures was also listed in the radiology reports, without further delineation, for example, pedicle, transverse processes, articular processes, lamina, spinous processes in seven patients.
MRI was only used for clarifying the acuity of a bony injury when this was not clear on CT. In contrast, ligamentous and cord injuries were based on MRI only. For ligamentous injuries, we included those where edema was noted in the ligaments as well as statements indicating possible/probable/suggestive/cannot exclude ligamentous injury in the setting of other factors. Hence, there is the potential for under coding of ligamentous injury, as those noted in the operating room would not be included, for example, if a patient went to the operating room for a jumped facet without MRI, likely they would have had a ligamentous injury, but given the absence of an MRI, it would not have been ascribed in this study. For cord injuries, we included cord compression, cord contusion, cord edema, cord hemorrhage, and cord injury only on MRI. In other words, if no MRI was performed, then no ligamentous or cord injury was counted in this study, regardless of CT or clinical findings. In the rare cases of discrepancy between radiology reports and clinical service, to maintain consistency, we used radiology reports.
The decision to perform spinal imaging in patients with or without prehospital cervical spinal motion restriction is at the discretion of the providers. Similarly, the decision to place or remove a collar on patients presenting to the ED is at the discretion of the treating provider in accordance with guidelines.26 27 CT scanning of the head/neck in the elderly is liberalized, regardless of symptomatology, in concordance with national trends and caveats of CT spine clearance rules.26 27 To this end, CT panscans in the elderly after ground level falls have noted significant new findings on imaging.28 Panscans in patients without obvious injury and significant mechanism has been previously shown to be worthwhile.29
Univariate statistical analyses of demographic and outcome variables were performed using SPSS V.26 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA), Tableau V.2020.4.13 (Seattle, Washington, USA), and R statistical software (Vienna, Austria). No data were imputed; missing variable details are described in the text and/or tables. Median values or percentages were reported as appropriate. Non-parametric tests for independent samples were used to examine the statistical significance of differences in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression models were also generated using R to determine predictors for prehospital C-SMR. In these analyses, we considered the following demographic factors: age, sex, year of discharge, MOI, Glasgow Coma Score in the ED (ED GCS), and severity of injuries (AIS) in the face, chest, abdomen, and extremity. ED GCS, as opposed to head/neck AIS, was used as it indicates mental status in the ED, regardless of underlying head or C-spine injury. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.