Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Creation and implementation of a novel clinical workflow based on the AAST uniform anatomic severity grading system for emergency general surgery conditions
  1. Kovi E Bessoff1,2,
  2. Jeff Choi1,2,
  3. Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell3,
  4. Aussama Khalaf Nassar2,4,
  5. David Spain2,3,
  6. Lisa Marie Knowlton1,2
  1. 1General Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  2. 2Students and Surgeons writing About Trauma, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  3. 3Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  4. 4Section of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kovi E Bessoff; kbessoff{at}stanford.edu

Abstract

Objective Emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions encompass a variety of diseases treated by acute care surgeons. The heterogeneity of these diseases limits infrastructure to facilitate EGS-specific quality improvement (QI) and research. A uniform anatomic severity grading system for EGS conditions was recently developed to fill this need. We integrated this system into our clinical workflow and examined its impact on research, surgical training, communication, and patient care.

Methods The grading system was integrated into our clinical workflow in a phased fashion through formal education and a written handbook. A documentation template was also deployed in our electronic medical record to prospectively assign severity scores at the time of patient evaluation. Mixed methods including a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews of trainees and attending surgeons were used to evaluate the impact of the new workflow and to identify obstacles to its adoption.

Results We identified 2291 patients presenting with EGS conditions during our study period. The most common diagnoses were small bowel obstruction (n=470, 20.5%), acute cholecystitis (n=384, 16.8%), and appendicitis (n=370, 16.1%). A total of 21 qualitative interviews were conducted. Twenty interviewees (95.2%) had a positive impression of the clinical workflow, citing enhanced patient care and research opportunities. Fifteen interviewees (75.0%) reported the severity grading system was a useful framework for clinical management, with five participants (25.0%) indicating the system was useful to facilitate clinical communication. Participants identified solutions to overcome barriers to adoption of the clinical workflow.

Conclusions The uniform anatomic severity grading system can be readily integrated into a clinical workflow to facilitate prospective data collection for QI and research. The system is perceived as valuable by users. Educational initiatives that focus on increasing familiarity with the system and its benefits will likely improve adoption of the classification system and the clinical workflow that uses it.

Level of evidence Level III.

  • general surgery
  • appendicitis
  • cholecystitis
  • Intestine
  • small
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors KEB, LMK, and SBM contributed to study design. Data collection was conducted by KEB. Article preparation and revision was conducted by all authors.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests KEB is a co-founder and minority owner of Ictero Medical, a medical device company developing a minimally invasive therapy for gallstone disease.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Stanford University’s Institutional Review Board approved this work as an expedited study (protocol 42152).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. Transcripts from interviews will be shared on request to the corresponding author.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.