Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Chance to cut: defining a negative exploration rate in patients with suspected necrotizing soft tissue infection
  1. Erin C Howell1,
  2. Jessica A Keeley2,
  3. Amy H Kaji3,
  4. Molly R Deane1,
  5. Dennis Y Kim1,
  6. Brant Putnam1,
  7. Steven L Lee4,
  8. Alexis L Woods5,
  9. Angela L Neville1
  1. 1 Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
  2. 2 Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco East Bay, Oakland, California, USA
  3. 3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
  4. 4 Division of Pediatric Surgery, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA
  5. 5 David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Angela L Neville, Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90509, USA; aneville{at}dhs.lacounty.gov

Abstract

Background Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) are aggressive infections associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite multiple predictive models for the identification of NSTI, a subset of patients will not have an NSTI at the time of surgical exploration. We hypothesized there is a subset of patients without NSTI who are clinically indistinguishable from those with NSTI. We aimed to characterize the differences between NSTI and non-NSTI patients and describe a negative exploration rate for this disease process.

Methods We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing surgical exploration for suspected NSTI at our county-funded, academic-affiliated medical center between 2008 and 2015. Patients were identified as having NSTI or not (non-NSTI) based on surgical findings at the initial operation. Pathology reports were reviewed to confirm diagnosis. The NSTI and non-NSTI patients were compared using χ2 test, Fisher’s exact test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results Of 295 patients undergoing operation for suspected NSTI, 232 (79%) were diagnosed with NSTI at the initial operation and 63 (21%) were not. Of these 63 patients, 5 (7.9%) had an abscess and 58 (92%) had cellulitis resulting in a total of 237 patients (80%) with a surgical disease process. Patients with NSTI had higher white cell counts (18.5 vs. 14.9 k/mm3, p=0.02) and glucose levels (244 vs. 114 mg/dL, p<0.0001), but lower sodium values (130 vs. 134 mmol/L, p≤0.0001) and less violaceous skin changes (9.2% vs. 23.8%, p=0.004). Eight patients (14%) initially diagnosed with cellulitis had an NSTI diagnosed on return to the operating room for failure to improve.

Conclusions Clinical differences between NSTI and non-NSTI patients are subtle. We found a 20% negative exploration rate for suspected NSTI. Close postoperative attention to this cohort is warranted as a small subset may progress.

Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, level III.

  • necrotizing soft tissue infections
  • necrotizing fasciitis
  • diagnosis
  • debridement
  • negative exploration

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Presented at Presented as an oral presentation on September 27, 2018 at the 4th World Trauma Congress in San Diego, CA.

  • Contributors All authors made significant contributions to this project and have had input on the final submission of this article. ECH, ALN: study inception/design, data collection, data analysis, creating tables/figures, drafting and critical revisions of the article. JAK: study inception/design, data collection, creating tables/figures, drafting and critical revisions of the article. AHK: study inception/design, data analysis, drafting and critical revisions of the article. MRD, DYK, BP, SLL: study inception/design, critical revisions of the article. ALW: data collection, drafting and critical revision of the article.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Institutional Review Board at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, and Los Angeles Biomedical Institute.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.