Concepts
State trauma system evaluation: A unique and comprehensive approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82649-6Get rights and content

We detail the unique and comprehensive approach to evaluation taken by the state of Washington before development and legislation of a statewide trauma system plan. The various types of data collected and the rationale for collecting them are discussed. In addition, the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of individual study methods are elucidated. These data-gathering approaches may serve as a guide for other states or regions contemplating comprehensive trauma system development.

References (20)

  • American College of Emergency Physicians

    Guidelines for trauma systems

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1987)
  • SaccoWJ et al.

    PARTITION: A quantitative method for evaluating prehospital services for trauma patients

    Comput Biol Med

    (1988)
  • Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons

    Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient

    (1990)
  • CooperGF

    Development of Trauma Systems: A State and Community Guide

    (1990)
  • ShackfordSR et al.

    The effect of regionalization upon the quality of trauma care as assessed by concurrent audit before and after institution of a trauma system: A preliminary report

    J Trauma

    (1986)
  • Washington State Trauma Project
  • Substitute Senate Bill 6191, State of Washington, 51st Legislature, March...
  • DonabedianA

    The quality of medical care

    Science

    (1978)
  • CalesRH et al.

    Preventable trauma deaths: A review of trauma care systems development

    JAMA

    (1985)
  • EspositoTJ et al.

    Trauma care systems development: Evolution and current trends

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text