Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Factor VIIa administration in traumatic brain injury: an AAST-MITC propensity score analysis
  1. Sarah Lombardo1,
  2. D Millar2,
  3. Gregory J Jurkovich3,
  4. Raul Coimbra4,
  5. Ram Nirula5
  1. 1Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  2. 2Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  3. 3Division of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
  4. 4Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
  5. 5Acute Care Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sarah Lombardo, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84109, USA; sarah.lombardo{at}hsc.utah.edu

Abstract

Background Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) has been used off-label as an adjunct in the reversal of warfarin therapy and management of hemorrhage after trauma. Only a handful of these reports are rigorous studies, from which results regarding safety and effectiveness have been mixed. There remains no clear consensus as to the role of rFVIIa in traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods Eleven level 1 trauma centers provided clinical data and head CT scans of patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≤13 and radiographic evidence of TBI. A propensity score (PS) to receive rFVIIa in those surviving ≥2 days was calculated for each patient based on patient demographics, comorbidities, physiology, Injury Severity Score, admission GCS score, and treatment center. Patients receiving rFVIIa within 24 hours of admission were matched to patients who did not receive rFVIIa for outcomes assessment. Subgroup analysis evaluated patients with primary head injury with PS matching.

Results There were 4284 patient observations; 129 received rFVIIa. Groups were comparable after matching. No differences in mortality or morbidity were found. Improvement in GCS score from admission to discharge was less among those receiving rFVIIa (5.5 vs. 2.4; P value 0.001); however, there was no difference in average GCS score at discharge. No significant differences in outcomes were identified in patients with isolated TBI receiving rFVIIa.

Discussion rFVIIa in early management of TBI is not associated with a decreased risk of mortality or morbidity, and may negatively impact recovery and functional status at discharge in the severely injured patient with polytrauma.

Level of evidence Level III.

Study type Therapeutic/care management.

  • traumatic brain injury (TBI)
  • Factor VII
  • coagulation factors
  • coagulopathy of trauma

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Literature search, data analysis, and writing: SL and RN. Study design: GJJ, RC, and RN. Data collection and data interpretation: DM, GJJ, RC, and RN. Critical revision: SL and RN.

  • Funding The data collection on the parent study for this work was supported by a Challenge Grant through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act/NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1RC1NS069066-01 and 5RC1NS069066-02).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval University of Utah Institutional Review Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.