Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Evolution of the operative management of colon trauma
  1. John P Sharpe,
  2. Louis J Magnotti,
  3. Timothy C Fabian,
  4. Martin A Croce
  1. Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr John P Sharpe, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine, 910 Madison Avenue #210, Memphis, TN 38163, USA; jsharpe6{at}uthsc.edu

Abstract

For any trauma surgeon, colon wounds remain a relatively common, yet sometimes challenging, clinical problem. Evolution in operative technique and improvements in antimicrobial therapy during the past two centuries have brought remarkable improvements in both morbidity and mortality after injury to the colon. Much of the early progress in management and patient survival after colon trauma evolved from wartime experience. Multiple evidence-based studies during the last several decades have allowed for more aggressive management, with most wounds undergoing primary repair or resection and anastomosis with an acceptably low suture line failure rate. Despite the abundance of quality evidence regarding management of colon trauma obtained from both military and civilian experience, there remains some debate among institutions regarding management of specific injuries. This is especially true with respect to destructive wounds, injuries to the left colon, blunt colon trauma and those wounds requiring colonic discontinuity during an abbreviated laparotomy. Some programs have developed data-driven protocols that have simplified management of destructive colon wounds, clearly identifying those high-risk patients who should undergo diversion, regardless of mechanism or anatomic location. This update will describe the progression in the approach to colon injuries through history while providing a current review of the literature regarding management of the more controversial wounds.

  • trauma/ critical care
  • colon
  • algorithm

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Drafting of manuscript: JPS.

    Critical revision: LJM, TCF and MAC.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.